Supreme Court

The morning read for Wednesday, March 6

The morning read for Wednesday, March 6

Share

Each weekday, we select a short list of news articles, commentary, and other noteworthy links related to the Supreme Court. Here’s the Wednesday morning read:

  • US Supreme Court seeks security funding to protect justices, homes (Nate Raymond, Reuters)
  • The Perils of Inconsistent Judicial Role Morality (Steve Vladeck, One First)
  • In Trump Cases, Supreme Court Cannot Avoid Politics (Adam Liptak, The New York Times)
  • The Supreme Court Just Delivered a Rare Self-Own for John Roberts (Richard Hasen, Slate)
  • The tyranny
… Read the rest
Supreme Court

Justices set aside university free speech challenge

Justices set aside university free speech challenge

Share

Amid the debate over free speech on university campuses, the justices on Monday set aside a decision by a federal appeals court in a case involving whether so-called “bias-response team policies” – procedures created by universities to solicit, track, and investigate reports of bias – chill students’ speech.

The order in Speech First v. Sands was part of a list of orders from the court’s private conference last week.

Over a dissent by Justice Clarence Thomas that was joined … Read the rest

Civil Law

NGO successfully challenges planning inspectors’ report on energy performance standards

The recent decision (20 February 2024) of the High Court in R (Rights Community Action) v Secretary of State is a rare example of an NGO succeeding in a climate change legal action under English law.  In the case, Rights Community Action persuaded the High Court to overturn a finding by the Secretary of State’s Planning Inspectors that a local authority’s “net zero” policy was unlawful.

The claim arose in relation to a proposed new “garden village” development in Oxfordshire.  … Read the rest

Supreme Court

The morning read for Friday, March 1

The morning read for Friday, March 1

Share

Each weekday, we select a short list of news articles, commentary, and other noteworthy links related to the Supreme Court. Here’s the Friday morning read:

  • Few large employers alter abortion coverage after Supreme Court ruling (Tami Luhby, CNN)
  • Pace of Supreme Court Immunity Case Shadowed by Looming Election (Adam Liptak, The New York Times)
  • The Scandal of Clarence Thomas’s New Clerk (Jane Mayer, The New Yorker)
  • Why the Supreme Court Had to Hear Trump’s Case (David B. Rivkin Jr.
… Read the rest
Civil Law

NYC Council Proposes Broad Non-Compete Ban

Seyfarth Synopsis: While New York State failed to pass a non-compete ban last year, a new bill in the New York City Council would eliminate non-compete agreements entirely, presenting new challenges and considerations for employers in the Big Apple.

On December 12, 2023, the New York State Legislature delivered a bill for the Governor’s signature that would have banned “any agreement, or clause contained in any agreement, between an employer and a covered individual that prohibits or restricts such covered individual from … Read the rest

Supreme Court

Justices seem to resolve Dogecoin arbitration dispute during argument

Justices seem to resolve Dogecoin arbitration dispute during argument

Share

Wednesday’s oral argument in Coinbase v. Suski was the court’s second case in February under the Federal Arbitration Act, and by all accounts this one will be a lot easier for them to resolve than Bissonnette v. LePage Bakeries. Coinbase is a technical dispute about the “delegation clause” in an arbitration agreement, which “delegates” to the arbitrator not only the job of resolving the dispute between the parties, but also the threshold question whether any particular dispute falls … Read the rest

Supreme Court

Bump-stock ban comes before Supreme Court

Bump-stock ban comes before Supreme Court

Share

The Supreme Court has already heard oral argument in one major gun-rights case this term, and on Wednesday the court will hear another. In November, the justices heard United States v. Rahimi, a challenge to the constitutionality of a federal law that makes it a crime for someone who is the subject of a domestic-violence restraining order to have a gun. Wednesday’s case involves the interpretation of federal law rather than the Second Amendment. The question before the court … Read the rest