Announcement of orders and opinions for Monday, June 6

Announcement of orders and opinions for Monday, June 6

Share

On Monday, June 6, we will be live blogging as the court releases orders from the June 2 conference and opinions in one or more argued cases from the current term.

Click here for a list of FAQs about opinion announcements.

The post Announcement of orders and opinions for Monday, June 6 appeared first on SCOTUSblog.

SCOTUSblogRead the rest

The return of the vaccine mandate for health workers and sovereign immunity for a Turkish bank

The return of the vaccine mandate for health workers and sovereign immunity for a Turkish bank

Share

This week we highlight cert petitions that ask the Supreme Court to consider, among other things, the Biden administration’s vaccine mandate for health care workers, and a Turkish bank’s immunity claim.

In Missouri v. Biden, the justices face a petition asking them to review on the merits the Biden administration’s vaccine policy for health care workers. The mandate requires nearly all health care workers at facilities that participate in Medicare and Medicaid to be fully vaccinated against COVID-19 … Read the rest

The morning read for Wednesday, June 1

The morning read for Wednesday, June 1

Share

Each weekday, we select a short list of news articles, commentary, and other noteworthy links related to the Supreme Court. To suggest a piece for us to consider, email us at roundup@scotusblog.com.

Here’s the Wednesday morning read:

  • Supreme Court case may determine winner of Pennsylvania’s GOP Senate primary (Ariane de Vogue, CNN)
  • Supreme Court blocks Texas social media moderation ban (Adi Robertson, The Verge)
  • Do Dissents of the Past Foreshadow Dissents on the Current Court? (Adam Feldman, Empirical SCOTUS)
Read the rest

The morning read for Friday, May 27

The morning read for Friday, May 27

Share

Each weekday, we select a short list of news articles, commentary, and other noteworthy links related to the Supreme Court. To suggest a piece for us to consider, email us at roundup@scotusblog.com.

Here’s the Friday morning read:

  • Federal agencies can use social cost of carbon — for now (Lesley Clark & Niina H. Farah, E&E News)
  • Federal judge takes rare step of backing U.S. Supreme Court
Read the rest

Beards and Brady (i.e., religious freedom and criminal procedure)

Beards and <em>Brady</em> (i.e., religious freedom and criminal procedure)

Share

This week we highlight cert petitions that ask the Supreme Court to consider, among other things, whether Georgia corrections can prevent a Muslim prisoner from growing an untrimmed beard in accordance with his religious beliefs, and whether defendants can only bring Brady claims for the prosecution’s failure to disclose exculpatory evidence if they meet a due diligence requirement.

Muslim prisoner argues that Georgia corrections’ limit on beard lengths violates his religious exercise

In Smith v. Ward, Lester Smith … Read the rest

Justices decline to block Biden policy on social costs of greenhouse gases

Justices decline to block Biden policy on social costs of greenhouse gases

Share

The Supreme Court on Thursday rejected a plea from Louisiana and nine other states to bar federal agencies from considering the social costs of greenhouse gases as part of their decision-making process. In a brief, unsigned order, the justices declined to reinstate a district-court ruling that had temporarily blocked the Biden administration from using the cost estimates. There were no dissents recorded from Thursday’s order.

The dispute in which the justices declined to intervene began last year, after President … Read the rest

Courts may not “make up” new procedural rules to favor arbitration

Courts may not “make up” new procedural rules to favor arbitration

Share

In a series of decisions, the Supreme Court has insisted that the Federal Arbitration Act requires courts to put arbitration contracts on “equal footing” with other kinds of contracts. These decisions have often favored companies seeking to enforce arbitration agreements, rejecting rules that give employees or consumers a way out from contract clauses requiring them to arbitrate their disputes on an individual basis. But Monday’s unanimous decision in Morgan v. Sundance clarifies that the equal-footing rule works both ways. … Read the rest