Court schedules final two argument sessions of 2022-23 term

Court schedules final two argument sessions of 2022-23 term

Share

The final argument session of the Supreme Court’s 2022-23 term will include high-profile disputes over how employers must accommodate their employees’ religious practices and how courts should decide whether threatening statements are protected by the First Amendment. The two cases, Groff v. DeJoy and Counterman v. Colorado, will headline the April argument calendar, which was released – along with the March argument calendar – on Tuesday.

The justices agreed earlier this month to take up Groff and CountermanRead the rest

The morning read for Friday, Jan. 27

The morning read for Friday, Jan. 27

Share

Each weekday, we select a short list of news articles, commentary, and other noteworthy links related to the Supreme Court. To suggest a piece for us to consider, email us at roundup@scotusblog.com.

Here’s the Friday morning read:

  • Kavanaugh says he’s ‘optimistic’ about the Supreme Court and trashes US News law school rankings (Ariane de Vogue & Devan Cole, CNN)
  • The New Kavanaugh Documentary Changes Nothing (Dahlia Lithwick, Slate)
  • When the chief justice himself was the Supreme Court leak (Jeffrey
Read the rest

Federal Courts Offer Law Day Resources on Civility and Decision-Making

Civility in the law and in life is the focus of the Judiciary’s 2023 Law Day resources for teachers, judges, and the legal community. Courtroom and classroom activities that give students real-life experience with civil discourse and solid decision-making skills are at the heart of the Judiciary’s national initiative Civil Discourse and Difficult Decisions.
Judiciary News – United States CourtsRead the rest

Arthrex seeks second Supreme Court intervention in patent clash

Arthrex seeks second Supreme Court intervention in patent clash

Share

The Petitions of the Week column highlights a selection of cert petitions recently filed in the Supreme Court. A list of all petitions we’re watching is available here.

Two years ago, the court ruled that medical device maker Arthrex, Inc., was wronged when the government made a final decision on a dispute over one of its patents by a panel of internally appointed officials. The justices held that the Constitution requires reviewability by a more senior patent officer … Read the rest

South Korea’s FSS Introduces New ESG Rating Guidelines to Enhance Transparency

On January 15, 2023, South Korea’s Financial Supervisory Service (“FSS”) issued new guidelines (the “Guidelines”) (Korean language only) to enhance transparency on the methods and procedures used by credit rating agencies to perform ESG bond certification evaluations. In announcing the Guidelines, the FSS noted that, prior to their introduction, there were no specific rules or regulations in South Korea covering the ESG certification process. The FSS also indicated that currently it is difficult to compare ESG … Read the rest

The morning read for Wednesday, Jan. 25

The morning read for Wednesday, Jan. 25

Share

Each weekday, we select a short list of news articles, commentary, and other noteworthy links related to the Supreme Court. To suggest a piece for us to consider, email us at roundup@scotusblog.com.

Here’s the Wednesday morning read:

  • Americans Like the Supreme Court More, But Still Not That Much (Greg Stohr, Bloomberg Law)
  • Navy christens massive ship bearing name of legendary Supreme Court Chief Justice Earl Warren (Gary Robbins, The San Diego Union-Tribune)
  • Student Loan Forgiveness: Will Comments on Dept.
Read the rest

Justices request federal government’s views on Texas and Florida social-media laws

Justices request federal government’s views on Texas and Florida social-media laws

Share

The Supreme Court on Monday asked the Biden administration for its views on a pair of controversial social-media laws enacted in Texas and Florida. Passed in response to beliefs that social-media platforms were censoring their users, particularly those expressing conservative political views, both states’ laws seek to regulate the content-moderation policies of social-media companies like Facebook and Twitter.

The justices asked the solicitor general to weigh in on NetChoice v. Paxton (a pending petition on the Texas law) and … Read the rest